Today's most viewed
| JOIN THE DEBATE |  | |  | | | | | NEWS | |  | |  | |  | | | SOUTHEND UNITED |  | |  | | | ECHO WOMAN |  | |  | |  | |  | | | HEALTH | |
|
|
|
Council pays £500k for 'gardening leave'
A COUNCIL has paid out more than £500,000 to suspended officers within the last two years, it has been revealed.
A total of 37 officers at Thurrock Council were suspended on full pay, the Echo discovered after a Freedom of Information request.
In total, £538,720 has been paid out to officers on "gardening leave" - at the cost of the taxpayer.
Eileen McCabe, formerly the council's disability services manager, was one of the employees suspended.
On June 25, 2007, she was suspended on full pay for eight months amid allegations of harassment and bullying.
Allegations included Mrs McCabe, 62, asking "too rudely" for coffee and photocopying.
Mrs McCabe appealed against the decision, yet Thurrock Council upheld her dismissal.
The council did admit the bullying and harassment was not intentional - after Mrs McCabe cited increasing pressure on meeting targets and stress at work as reasons for her behaviour.
Mrs McCabe, of Thames Road, Grays, was earning almost £55,000 a year at the time of her suspension.
She is currently applying to appeal at an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal.
She has revealed how she was diagnosed with reactive depression and considered suicide at the time of her suspension.
She said: "I did not then, and do not now, believe anything I had done was so heinous as to justify my summary dismissal."
The £538,721 cost includes basic pay, business user allowance for their cars and pension costs.
It does not include agency, temporary or acting cover by external agencies or staff.
Mrs McCabe added: "Whatever the eventual amount of money paid out by Thurrock Council from the tax payers' pocket, the personal cost to each individual who has to endure such treatment is far higher and cannot be so easily set aside."
A Thurrock Council spokesman said: "The council only suspends employees where it is considered inappropriate to maintain the employee's attendance while an investigation is carried out and, wherever possible, the council retains employees in post to continue service delivery while investigations are undertaken."
10:00am Friday 4th July 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: andy, London on 3:02pm Fri 4 Jul 08
Thirty seven !!..
Posted by: devils Advocate, boozledon on 2:47am Sat 5 Jul 08
What is it about local councils? Every day you just read more and more costly expenditure! Could it be just that it isn't their money that they are chucking about? Or is it the fact that, as a nation, Britain has totally lost the plot? We just get worse and worse! Perhaps we should never have given women equality, it seemed to start around then!
What is it about local councils? Every day you just read more and more costly expenditure! Could it be just that it isn't their money that they are chucking about? Or is it the fact that, as a nation, Britain has totally lost the plot? We just get worse and worse! Perhaps we should never have given women equality, it seemed to start around then!
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!